babelblogs

hosted by cafebabel.com

Sevilla Babel

A window at the south of Europe

To content | To menu | To search

Monday, May 12 2008

Two Words for Europe - An Account of an Event

Europe Day on May 9th is a day of celebration for all Babelians. In its honour, Cafébabel's Seville team decided to organise some activities that citizens could take part in.

cafebabel5.jpg
Fifty-eight years after the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Robert Schuman, read Jean Monnet's declaration proposing the creation of a supranational European institution to administer coal and steel, we took to the streets to ask passers-by to write "two words for Europe" on the blank panels we had put on the walls of Seville's town hall. Some people were taken aback by our request, as they had always thought of the old continent as cafebabel3.jpgbeing something distant and unrelated to their lives. Others, however, approached the task with curiosity and were interested in our cause.
Tens of people from every background and of every age took the time to leave a brief testimony encompassing their idea of Europe. Things were brought to a standstill as various school groups were encouraged to participate under the watchful eyes of their teachers. "Come on, Europe! That sounds familiar, doesn't it? From the exam yesterday. Do you think you can write something worthwhile?" they asked some students who were frantically passing the pen around among themselves.

Many university students joined in, associating Europe with freedom, peace, identity, multiculturalism and books, among other things. Some adorned the panels with Spanish witticisms and puns, adding authenticity and a hint of humour to the event. We still haven't managed to decipher one of the messages, which is written in Finnish... but we're working on it. After all, it wasn't just Spanish that made an appearance on that sunny sevillano morning.

cafebabel1.jpgTwo-hundred flyers announcing the afternoon debate on "How much more can the EU expand?" were handed out to those who approached us. The mayor of Seville himself, Alfredo Sánchez Monteseirín, was given a flyer by our coordinator, Concha Hierro, who told him about our Babelian initiative. After two hours in Plaza Nueva, we moved on to San Fernando Street outside the Rector's Office - the hub of the city's university. There we came across a small orchestra playing the European Anthem, as well as an information desk offering a variety of material about the formation of the EU and its issues. We took part in hoisting the European flag and continued to spread the word about Cafébabel. The arrival of lunchtime marked the end of a fruitful morning in which we played our part in taking Europe to the streets. Many definitions and words were written about Europe, but none of them were quite illustrative as those left by a German-Spanish couple: "We love each other."Maybe that's what Europe is about.

Concha Hierro
Photos: Sara Domínguez Martín
Translation by Jessie L. (miralaluna)

Sunday, May 4 2008

Video surveillance: Freedom vs. Security?

On April 26th, the Cafebabel local team in Seville organized a coffee-debate within the framework of the project 'Seville on the ground', in which five European journalists travel to a city and report about it. The chosen topic was the video surveillance in downtown Seville and the Zemos 98 Association was the special guest. The debate was moderated by Concha Hierro, and lasted approximately two hours.

debateThere were a lot of opinions and the positions were very different. Some came in with a mind and got out with another, others kept their opinions (which got even stronger), and others started to think harder about the issue. A lot of issues were proposed, a lot of arguments were launched and a lot of opinions were confronted.
On the one hand, the issue of privacy was assessed: would cameras take freedom away from us? Many people maintain that life in the street wouldn’t be the same; people would be more repressed, they would feel watched over and stalked and wouldn’t do certain things because of embarrassment or for fear of their image being used for different purposes (as an example, it was cited: who would go into a sex shop, knowing that is being watched over?). Those who share this opinion believe that life in the areas under vigilance would be more monotonous: people would stop doing foolish things in the street, the couples wouldn’t kiss so much and laughter would be controlled. Daily things would become worries, although playing the fool kissing and laughing are not a crime at all.

On the other hand, some people believe that cameras can really provide more safety. They maintain that, although they are not “the” solution, cameras are an important starting point for, at least, reducing street crime. The case of the girl assaulted in the subway was cited to justify the importance of cameras in an event like this. If it weren’t for the images recorded, how would the aggressor be identified? Besides, those who share this view firmly believe that after a while, people would forget that they are being recorded and it wouldn’t affect their daily life. In their opinion, cameras are another means to try and protect people, and those who don’t behave badly don’t have to fear the introduction of video surveillance.

DEBATE_15_copie.jpgAnother argument presented by those who are against this practice, is the fact that often the cameras are there, but there isn’t anybody behind them really watching what happens in the street. Besides that, the reluctance has to do with who is watching. Who will guarantee that this person is reliable and that the images won’t be used for a different purpose? Defenders of this cause say that to spend money on something without a guarantee isn’t worth it: they prefer to invest in education.
On the contrary, those in favor of the cameras maintain that spending money in education is always good, but it’s not going to solve the problem. In their opinion, this is a much deeper issue because it would be to change the system; it’s one of the solutions, but in the long run. We must invest in education and improve the basis but, meanwhile, we must resort to quicker support. There are places in which video surveillance helped to send criminals to jail in real time; there were people behind the cameras in permanent contact with the police in the street. It didn’t do away with crime, but managed to reduce it. The question was shot: why not give it a try?

A controversial issue was launched by one of the participants: Why to put cameras in the noble areas of Seville, like the C/ Sierpes and Nervion and not to put then in the 3,000 housing, where crime is really alarming? According to their reasons, if we don’t put the cameras where they are truly needed, there’s no need to put them in any other place. Those who agree with the setting of the monitoring system also maintain that those places need cameras more than other places, but in no way it prevents the installation from starting in the area where tourists concentrate and where it is easier to spot and catch a thief.

We finished the debate without reaching an agreement. The interactivity, the discussion, very well-argued interventions and the encouragement in the production of ideas were, no doubt, the strong points of the meeting; points which made all the participants think about a very important issue, not so emphasized as it should be.

Gabriela Azevedo Forlin
Photography: Bénédicte Salzes
Translated by Diana Irene Arancibia

Monday, April 14 2008

Intellectuals as correspondents in fratricide Spain

As the English Hispanist Hugh Thomas claimed, “ as back in the 1850’s was the great time of ambassadors, the 30’s were the golden age of foreign correspondents”. They were years of redefinition of European and worldwide politics.

Foto_1_corresponsales.bmp
From the end of July 1936, and for two years and a half, it was usual to find the greatest world reporters to the South of the Pyrenees”, Thomas continued. The French author of El Principito, Saint-Exupéry; the American photographer Robert Capa, pseudonym under which worked Andrés Friedmann,his girlfriend Gerda Taro y Chim Seymour; the British social democrat George Orwell; the irreverent Italian Indro Montanelli; the American John Dos Passos; y Ernest Hemingway or his wife and pioneer Martha Gellhorn, among others, got together in one of the fratricide wars that set the course for European and world politics: the Spanish Civil War (1936-39).

preston_03.jpgThe Centre for Andalusian Studies, in collaboration with the Instituto Cervantes and the Fundación socialista Pablo Iglesias, chaired by Alfonso Guerra, brings to Sevilla the exhibition “Correspondents in the Spain War”, inaugurated in New York in 2006. A collection of articles and interviews which show how these intellectuals, mostly staying at Florida Hotel, lived and wrote. A job on the edge of events, which would mark the history of journalism.
The poor walls of the Florida, on Callao Square in Madrid, were the faithful witness of intimate conversations between Hemingway and his third wife, Martha Gellhorn, of the development of thinking in many of those who wrote on their tables and the many sleepless nights after what their eyes had seen during the day. It was the harsh Spain of passions that was killing itself.

Jay Allen, one of the last to interview José Antonio Primo de Rivera before his execution in 1936, reproduces the following dialogue with Franco in one of his articles published in the Chicago Daily Tribune on 28 July 1936:
Allen: “Isn’t there any possibility of a truce, or a compromise?
Franco: “No. No, definitely not. We fight for Spain.. They fight against Spain. We are determined to go ahead at any cost”.
Allen: “You will have to kill half of Spain”, I said.
He turned his head, smiled and looking at me, he firmly said:
Franco: “I said at any cost”.

The Civil War had started in a remote country to the South of Europe. Stalin’s eyes would be in every step taken by his Soviet spy, Harold Philby, who wrote chronicles in favour of Franco, to win his trust. The ideologies were arm-wrestling for the hegemony over Europe in a ruthlessly crazy Spain.

THE ROLE OF WOMEN

At the exhibition we can also appreciate that not only the men reflected through their cameras and articles the details of the Civil War. Women journalists appeared with the same courage as their male peers. That desire to be present at decisive stages of the conflict would take German photographer Gerda Taro’s life.

gerda_taro_02.jpgExiled in Paris after the arrival to power of Natzis, due to her Jewish origin and her socialist militancy, Taro would learn the tricks of the trade of photography through Hungarian Andre Friedman, also of Jewish origin, who later would be her partner. Together with him she would create the fictitious character of Robert Capa, a so-called famous photographer from the USA. Through that strategy they intended to get more jobs, and it really worked. Soon after that, a conflict would break out which would mobilize the whole Europe: the Spanish Civil War. The couple didn’t hesitate and moved to Spain, where they worked for French magazines like Vu or Regards.
She also carried out interviews by herself, and in one of them she would lose her life a summer day in 1937. After a national bombing over republican positions in the battle of Brunete, the confusion caused a republican tank to crush her, leaving her badly hurt, and she finally died in a hospital of El Escorial. Gerda was only 27 years old. A few days later she would be buried in Paris with all the honours.

It is, no doubt, the most dramatic case, but she wasn’t the only woman who ventured in the, at that time, dangerous Spanish land. The American Marta Gellhorn, also connected to another man of internacional entity like Ernest Hemingway when she became his third wife, was a correspondent for Collier’s magazine during the conflict. She would also continue her work during World War II. In 1969, Hemingway would abandon her and join his fourth wife, the correspondent of magazine Times, Mary Welsh. Despite the dangers her life went through, she wouldn’t die until ten years ago, when she was 89 years old and, the same as her ex-husband, she put an end to her life voluntarily. Sick with cancer, a pill did to her what hundreds of bombings couldn’t.
The New York Times entrusted the journalist Virginia Cowles with the chronicles from the republican side. She perceived from there the worry caused by the air raids. “The people’s state of mind has weakened under the atrocious destruction coming from heaven..
From Northern Europe arrived Barbro Alving, Swedish journalist who in 1936 moved to Spain to report on the war. Her newspaper, the Dagens Nyheter, financed her activity as a journalist in Spain, but declined responsibilities for the mission risks. Her chronicles from the front gave her international recognition. Later, she would cover relevant events like the interview between Hitler and Mussolini, the war in Finland and the devastation caused by the bomb thrown over Hiroshima.

In those days the war was mainly “men stuff ” but, these women left their countries to try and prevent the rule which says “in the war the first victim is the truth” from becoming true. Her chronicles travelled around a convulsed world in which the boundary between information and propaganda, was just a diffuse line.
Journalism is indebted to them.

Concha Hierro and Álvaro Sánchez
Translated by Diana Irene Arancibia

*In the first photograph Mijail Koltsov, de ‘Pravda’, with photographer Roman Karmen in a trench. In the second, the Florida hotel.. In the last one, Gerda Taro and Robert Capa.